Stea vs Navattic
Built for GTM teams to make demos without engineering. Ours is the live product instead of a built copy.
What Navattic says it does
Navattic describes itself as “a no-code platform built for go-to-market teams to create interactive product demos without engineering help”, with an AI Copilot and a Storyboard Generator to build demos faster.
Read on 1 October 2026 from their own site. Where they do not state a behaviour, the table below says so rather than scoring it against them.
What Navattic is good at
- Your marketing team ships a demo this afternoon without asking engineering for anything.
- Demos embedded across a site and a sequence, at the scale of a content team.
- A long customer list — they publish over a thousand — so the path is well worn.
What is different about Stea
Nobody on your side builds anything
Their pitch is that your GTM team can build a demo without engineering, which is a real advantage over asking for dev time. Ours is that nobody builds a demo at all: you hand over a sandbox login, we write the actions once, and the agent assembles what each visitor sees from those actions.
The product is the demo
A built demo is accurate on the day it is built. Because we drive the running product, there is nothing to keep in sync — and when an action stops matching the screen the agent says it cannot show that rather than showing you something stale.
Side by side
When Navattic is the better buy
If what you need is in the list above, buy that. We take a week to set up, charge a fixed fee to write the actions for your product, and then charge per demo that answered someone — which is a bad trade if you wanted something publishable this afternoon, and a good one if more people ask to see your product than your team has hours to show it.